BBC Learnings · Section 8
How to disagree better
In this programme, we'll be talking about disagreeing. Er, no we won't.
Level: B2 · 105 sentences
Transcript
- In this programme, we'll be talking about disagreeing.
- Er, no we won't.
- I think we will, Rob.
- We're discussing the following.
- Is it good... to disagree.
- I know, but I feel better for having that little disagreement,
- so that proves it is good to disagree.
- Well, I hate to disagree,
- but I think we should explore the subject a little further first in the next six minutes.
- Er, shouldn't that be five minutes?
- Oh Rob, you're being pedantic,
- focusing too much on the small details or formal rules.
- Maybe we should agree to disagree?
- Then move on to the quiz question I like to set every week.
- Yes, a good idea.
- OK, so do you know which spiritual leader is famous for saying,
- disagreement is something normal?
- Is it a Pope Francis,
- b the Dalai Lama or c Ravi Shankar?
- That's tricky.
- So I'll have a guess and say b the Dalai Lama.
- OK, I'll let you know
- if that was correct at the end of the programme.
- But whoever said disagreement is something normal is probably right.
- I'm sure we all disagree with someone about something, don't we, Rob?
- No.
- Just joking.
- Of course, disagreeing is normal.
- It would be boring if we agreed about everything.
- However, I guess agreement on some things may have prevented a few wars.
- Indeed.
- But it is a fascinating subject
- and it's something the BBC Radio 4 programme, A Guide to Disagreeing Better, looked at.
- I think we should hear about how not to disagree first.
- This is couples therapist, author and speaker Esther Perel,
- who knows a thing or two about that.
- In a battle, you position yourself in a hierarchy.
- One is on top of the other.
- And then there is arguing that comes with contempt,
- in which it's not just that I don't accept your point of view,
- it's that I actually really think you're a lesser human being.
- Right, so Esther explains that bad disagreement is a battle.
- One person tries to take a higher position in the hierarchy.
- A hierarchy is a way of organising people according to their importance.
- So a disagreement doesn't go well
- if one person thinks they're more important than someone else.
- And according to Esther, things also don't go well if someone has contempt,
- which is a dislike or lack of respect for someone or something.
- And contempt in a bad disagreement can be more than just not liking somebody's point of view,
- their perspective on something.
- It could be thinking someone is a lesser human being.
- Ouch!
- That's not nice!
- Let's think more about good disagreement.
- The BBC podcast Seriously has listed some tips for disagreeing better,
- including not aiming for the middle ground another way of saying compromising.
- It also suggests speaking truthfully,
- listening intently that means giving all your attention to what's being said and aiming for empathy,
- but not feeling at the end of a disagreement that you have to agree.
- I agree.
- And I'm sure former British politician Douglas Alexander would too.
- He presented the programme, A Guide to Disagreeing Better,
- and explained why he thought disagreeing is a good thing.
- The couple of decades I spent as an elected politician convinced me that disagreement is necessary
- if society is to progress.
- And a society that values civility over justice and truth would simply be a recipe for stagnation.
- But honest conversations involve listening intently as well as speaking truthfully.
- The thoughts of Douglas Alexander there,
- who through his work as a politician is convinced that disagreement is a good thing.
- He says we shouldn't just follow the values of civility,
- that means polite behaviour.
- It's important to challenge and question thoughts and ideas.
- not just be polite and accept them.
- Yes, and if we don't challenge things and search for truth and justice,
- he feels it would lead to stagnation,
- staying the same and not developing.
- The verb form is to stagnate.
- But he does say that when we discuss things and disagree,
- we must be honest, listen to the other person intently and speak truthfully.
- But I would add that this should be done politely and with respect.
- Well, Sam, I've been listening to you intently and, if I'm honest,
- I think it's about time you gave me the answer to today's question.
- We can agree on that, Rob.
- So, earlier I asked you
- if you knew which spiritual leader is famous for saying,
- disagreement is something normal.
- Is it a Pope Francis,
- b the Dalai Lama, or c Ravi Shankar?
- And Rob, what did you say?
- I said it's b the Dalai Lama.
- And you were right.
- Well done.
- Now, if you'll agree,
- could we recap some of the vocabulary we've discussed in this programme?
- Of course.
- First of all, I was accused of being pedantic focusing too much on the small details or formal rules.
- Then we mentioned hierarchy this is a way of organising people according to their importance.
- Contempt is a dislike or lack of respect for something or someone.
- A point of view describes someone's perspective on something,
- your point of view might be different from my point of view.
- Indeed.
- And we also mentioned civility, which means polite behaviour.
- And stagnation means staying the same and not developing.
- Would you agree, Sam?
- You are right, Rob.