IELTS Listening · Cam 11
Cam11 - Test 2 - Part 4
We've been discussing the factors the architect has to consider when designing domestic buildings.
Level: C1 · 57 sentences
Transcript
- We've been discussing the factors the architect has to consider when designing domestic buildings.
- I'm going to move on now to consider the design of public buildings,
- and I'll illustrate this by referring to the new Taylor Concert Hall that's recently been completed here in the city.
- So, as with a domestic building,
- when designing a public building, an architect needs to consider the function of the building -
- for example, is it to be used primarily for entertainment, or for education, or for administration?
- The second thing the architect needs to think about is the context of the building,
- this includes its physical location obviously,
- but it also includes the social meaning of the building:
- how it relates to the people it's built for.
- And finally, for important public buildings,
- the architect may also be looking for a central symbolic idea on which to base the design,
- a sort of metaphor for the building and the way in which it is used.
- Let's look at the new Taylor Concert Hall in relation to these ideas.
- The location chosen was a site in a run-down district that has been ignored in previous redevelopment plans.
- It was occupied by a factory that had been empty for some years.
- The whole area was some distance from the high-rise office blocks of the central business district and shopping centre,
- but it was only one kilometre from the ring road.
- The site itself was bordered to the north by a canal
- which had once been used by boats bringing in raw materials when the area was used for manufacturing.
- The architect chosen for the project was Tom Harrison.
- He found the main design challenge was the location of the site in an area that had no neighbouring buildings of any importance.
- To reflect the fact that the significance of the building in this quite run-down location was as yet unknown,
- he decided to create a building centred around the idea of a mystery -
- something whose meaning still has to be discovered.
- So how was this reflected in the design of the building?
- Well, Harrison decided to create pedestrian access to the building
- and to make use of the presence of water on the site.
- As people approach the entrance, they therefore have to cross over a bridge.
- He wanted to give people a feeling of suspense
- as they see the building first from a distance, and then close-up,
- and the initial impression he wanted to create from the shape of the building as a whole was that of a box.
- The first side that people see, the southern wall, is just a high, flat wall uninterrupted by any windows.
- This might sound off-putting,
- but it supports Harrison's concept of the building -
- that the person approaching is intrigued and wonders what will be inside.
- And this flat wall also has another purpose.
- At night-time, projectors are switched on and it functions as a huge screen,
- onto which images are projected.
- The auditorium itself seats 1500 people.
- The floor's supported by ten massive pads.
- These are constructed from rubber,
- and so are able to absorb any vibrations from outside
- and prevent them from affecting the auditorium.
- The walls are made of several layers of honey-coloured wood,
- all sourced from local beech trees.
- In order to improve the acoustic properties of the auditorium and to amplify the sound,
- they are not straight, they are curved.
- The acoustics are also adjustable according to the size of orchestra and the type of music being played.
- In order to achieve this, there are nine movable panels in the ceiling above the orchestra
- which are all individually motorized,
- and the walls also have curtains which can be opened or closed to change the acoustics.
- The reaction of the public to the new building has generally been positive.
- However, the evaluation of some critics has been less enthusiastic.
- In spite of Harrison's efforts to use local materials,
- they criticise the style of the design as being international rather than local,
- and say it doesn't reflect features of the landscape or society for which it is built.