TED Talks · Neuroscience
The computer and your mind
You've seen this in sci-fi movies, Machines in the future that can read our thoughts.
Level: B2 · 145 sentences
Transcript
- You've seen this in sci-fi movies,
- Machines in the future that can read our thoughts.
- However, there are devices today
- That can read the electrical activity from our brains.
- We call this the EEG.
- Is there information contained in these brain waves?
- And if so, could we train a computer to read our thoughts?
- My buddy Nathan has been working to hack the EEG
- To build a mind-reading machine.
- So this is how the EEG works.
- Inside your head is a brain.
- And that brain is made out of billions of neurons.
- Each of those neurons send an electrical message to each other.
- Now, these small messages can combine to make an electrical wave
- That we can detect on a monitor.
- Now, traditionally, the EEG can tell us large-scale things, for example,
- If you're asleep or if you're alert.
- But can it tell us anything else?
- Can it actually read our thoughts?
- Well, we're going to test this.
- And we're not going to start with some complex thoughts.
- We're going to do something very simple.
- Can we interpret what someone is seeing using only their brain waves?
- Nathan's going to begin by placing electrodes on Christie's head.
- My life is tangled.
- And then he's going to show her
- A bunch of pictures from four different categories.
- Face, house, scenery, and weird pictures.
- As we show Christie hundreds of these images,
- We are also capturing the electrical waves onto Nathan's computer.
- We want to see if we can detect
- Any visual information about the photos contained in the brain waves.
- So when we're done, we're going to see
- If the EEG can tell us what kind of picture Christie is looking at.
- And if it does, each category should trigger a different brain signal.
- Okay, so we collected all the raw EEG data,
- And this is what we got.
- It all looks pretty messy, so let's arrange them by picture.
- Now it's still a bit too noisy to see any differences,
- But if we average the EEG across
- All image types by aligning them to when the image first appeared,
- We can remove this noise.
- And pretty soon we can see
- Some dominant patterns emerge for each category.
- Now the signals all still look pretty similar.
- Let's take a closer look.
- About 100 milliseconds after the image comes on,
- We see a positive bump in all four cases.
- And we call this the P100.
- And what we think that is is what happens in your brain
- When you recognize an object.
- But damn, look at that signal for the face.
- It looks different than the others.
- There's a negative dip about 170 milliseconds after the image comes on.
- What could be going on here?
- Research shows that our brain has a lot of neurons
- That are dedicated to recognizing human faces.
- So this N170 spike could be all those neurons
- Firing at once in the same location.
- We could detect that in the EEG.
- So there are two takeaways here.
- One, our eyes can't really detect the differences in patterns
- Without averaging out the noise.
- And two, even after removing the noise,
- Our eyes can only pick up the signals associated with faces.
- So this is where we turn to machine learning.
- Now our eyes are not very good
- At picking up patterns and noisy data.
- But machine learning algorithms are designed to do just that.
- So can we take a lot of pictures
- And a lot of data
- And feed it in and train a computer
- To be able to interpret what Christie's looking at in real time?
- We're trying to decode the information
- That's coming out of her EEG in real time
- And predict what it is that her eyes are looking at.
- And if it works, what we should see is every time
- That she gets a picture of scenery,
- It should say scenery, scenery, scenery, scenery.
- A face, face, face, face, face.
- It's not quite working that way is what we're discovering.
- OK.
- So what's going on here?
- We need a new career, I think.
- OK.
- So that was a massive failure.
- But we're still curious.
- How far can we push this technology?
- Now, we look back at what we did.
- We noticed that the data was coming into our computer very quickly
- Without any timing of when the images came on.
- And that's the equivalent of reading a very long sentence
- Without spaces between the words.
- Something like that would be hard to read,
- But once we add the spaces, individual words appear,
- And it becomes a lot more understandable.
- But what if we cheat a little bit?
- By using a sensor,
- We can tell the computer when the image first appears.
- That way, the brainwaves stop being a continuous stream of information
- And instead become individual packets of meaning.
- Also, we're going to cheat a little bit more
- By limiting the categories to two.
- Let's see if we can do some real-time mind reading.
- In this new experiment,
- We're going to sort of constrict it a little bit more
- So that we know the onset of the image,
- And we're going to limit the categories to face or scenery.
- Face.
- Correct.
- Scenery.
- Correct.
- So right now, every time the image comes on,
- We're taking a picture of the onset of the image
- And decoding the EEG.
- It's getting correct.
- Yes.
- Face.
- So there is information in the EEG signal, which is cool.
- We just had to align it to the onset of the image.
- Scenery, correct.
- Face, yeah.
- What this means is that there is some information there.
- So we can tell,
- If we know at what time the picture came on,
- We can tell what type of picture it was, possibly,
- At least on average,
- By looking at these evoked potentials.
- Exactly.
- Now, if you would have told me at the beginning
- Of this project this was possible, I would have said, no way.
- I literally did not think you could do this.
- Did our mind reading experiment really work?
- Yes, but we had to do a lot of cheating.
- Now it turns out you can find
- Some interesting things in the EEG.
- For example, if you're looking at someone's face.
- But it does have a lot of limitations.
- Perhaps advances in machine learning will make huge strides
- And one day we'll be able to decode
- What's going on in our thoughts.
- But for now, the next time a company says
- That they can harness your brainwaves to be able to control devices,
- It is your right,
- It is your duty to be skeptical.