BBC Learnings · Section 7
Is this the era of distrust
As well as bringing the world to a halt, the coronavirus epidemic has led to an increase in misinformation –
Level: C1 · 114 sentences
Transcript
- As well as bringing the world to a halt,
- the coronavirus epidemic has led to an increase in misinformation –
- lies and conspiracy theories on the internet.
- In an era of fake news,
- where even the President of the United States is accused of spreading misinformation,
- Could it be that we are living through a crisis in trust?
- What is trust?
- And who should we place our trust in?
- These are some of the questions we'll be discussing
- in this programme. And we'll be hearing from a philosopher
- who believes the problem is not about trust itself,
- but about trustworthiness –
- the ability to be trusted as being honest and reliable.
- And, as always, we'll be learning
- some related vocabulary along the way.
- Of course, telling lies and lacking trustworthiness is nothing new.
- Just think of the Trojan horse
- used to trick the ancient Greeks.
- More recently, the American financier Bernie Madoff became
- infamous as the biggest swindler in history.
- In 2009, he was sentenced to 150 years
- in prison for his part in the Ponzi scam.
- But how much did he defraud from investors?
- That's my quiz question.
- $65 million or c $65 billion?
- I'll say b $65 million.
- OK Rob, we'll come back to that later.
- Generally speaking, trust can be described
- as a judgement that someone can be believed and relied upon.
- When we trust each other, it
- makes life easier, quicker and friendlier.
- Society can't function without trust,
- so does that mean the more trust the better?
- Well, not according to philosopher Honora O'Neill.
- Here he is speaking to David Edmonds,
- presenter of the BBC World Service programme, The Big Idea.
- We have another word which is gullible.
- And if you simply place trust indiscriminately
- without making a judgment about whether
- the other person or institution is trustworthy,
- then just trusting to luck, as we
- say, is probably not a virtue.
- There's a difference between trusting someone
- because you have good reason to believe them
- and being gullible – that's easy to deceive because you
- trust and believe people too quickly.
- If you don't judge who is trustworthy and who is not,
- you are trusting to luck – simply believing
- or hoping that things will happen for the best.
- But being gullible and trusting to luck
- is exactly how Bernie Madoff was able to trick
- so many people into giving him their money.
- Their biggest mistake was to trust him indiscriminately,
- in a way that does not show care
- or judgment, usually with harmful results.
- So if indiscriminately trusting people is such
- a bad idea, how do we avoid it?
- How can we tell who is trustworthy and who is not?
- Here's the BBC World Service's Big Idea presenter,
- David Edmonds, asking Onora O'Neill to give some details.
- An individual or organisation is trustworthy
- if they can justifiably be trusted.
- To be trustworthy, they need three ingredients.
- First, honesty. People have to be able to believe what they're told.
- Second, competence. Beyond honesty and competence,
- there's a third element to trustworthiness, reliability.
- That's the boring one.
- That's just being honest and competent each time
- so that it's not enough to be episodically honest
- and competent for some of the things you claim
- to be able to do but not others.
- Philosopher Honora O'Neill identifies three ingredients for trustworthiness.
- Honesty, competence and reliability.
- Competence means the ability to do something well.
- You would trust a car mechanic to fix your broken car engine,
- but you wouldn't go to them for dental work.
- They're not competent to remove your tooth like a dentist is.
- And you wouldn't trust your dentist
- to fix your broken-down car either.
- Onora O'Neill also mentions reliability – being trustworthy
- because you behave well all the time
- and keep all the promises you make.
- It's the combination of these three – being honest,
- competent and reliable – that makes someone truly trustworthy.
- And not someone like Bernie Madoff,
- who would run off with your money and entire life savings.
- All of which brings me to my quiz question.
- Do you remember, Rob?
- Yeah, I do. You asked how much Bernie Madoff stole
- from the American investors he lied to.
- And I said b $65 million.
- But in fact it was c $65 billion –
- a lot of money to give to such an untrustworthy man.
- So, we've been discussing whether there is a crisis of trust
- and asking how to know who is trustworthy –
- able to be trusted as honest, competent and reliable.
- Placing your trust in someone trustworthy
- is very different from being gullible – easy to trick
- because you trust and believe people too quickly.
- And it can also be unhelpful to trust things to luck –
- simply hope or believe that everything
- will work out for the best.
- Both of these problems come about when people trust indiscriminately.
- in an unsystematic way that does not show care
- or judgment, usually with harmful results,
- as Bernie Madoff's victims found out to their cost.
- But luckily there are many trustworthy people around,
- and we can spot them using three criteria – honesty ,
- competence and reliability.
- Competence means an ability to do something well,
- in the correct and effective way.
- And reliability means being honest and competent all the time.
- not just being honest sometimes or reliable in some actions,
- but not others.