IELTS Listening · Cam 4
Cam4 - Test 2 - Part 4
So far, in these lectures, we've been looking at crimes like robbery and murder - both from a historical viewpoint and also in contemporary society -
Level: C1 · 84 sentences
Transcript
- So far, in these lectures, we've been looking at crimes like robbery and murder -
- both from a historical viewpoint and also in contemporary society -
- and we've seen that the preoccupation in Western society with crime and with lawlessness
- is part of a long and continuous tradition,
- rather than something which is new and unique to modern society.
- But over the past seventy years or so, there has been a massive increase in one type of crime,
- which is what's known as 'corporate crime'.
- Corporate crime is crime which, as the name suggests,
- is connected with companies, with business organisations.
- It includes illegal acts of either individuals or a group within the company,
- but what is important is that these acts are normally in accordance with the goals of the company -
- they're for the good of the company rather than the individual.
- It's been defined as,
- quote, 'crime which is committed for the corporate organisation' - the company - 'not against it', unquote.
- So crimes like theft by employees -
- things like embezzlement or fraud against one's actual employer are excluded according to this definition.
- The employees may be involved
- but they're acting in the first place for the company -
- they may not even realise they're committing a crime
- or they may realise but they feel it's excusable because it's policy,
- or because otherwise they may lose their jobs.
- So here, really, we're talking about the links between power and crime.
- Now, this is one area that much less is generally known about than conventional or traditional crime.
- It has been relatively ignored by the mass media -
- for example, it tends to be under-reported in comparison with conventional crime in news broadcasts,
- and in crime serials and films and so on -
- they very rarely deal with corporate crime.
- And it also tends to be ignored in academic circles -
- there's been far more research on conventional crime and far more data is available.
- There are several reasons for this lack of interest in corporate crime, compared with other types of crime.
- It's often very complex,
- whereas with conventional crime, it's usually possible to follow what's going on without specialist knowledge.
- As well as this, whereas conventional crime usually has a lot of human interest,
- corporate crime often has much less.
- The third reason, and possibly the most significant one,
- is that very often the victims are unaware -
- they think their misfortune is an accident
- or that it's the fault of no-one in particular.
- They're unaware that they've been victims of a crime.
- So, when we look at the effects of corporate crime,
- we may find it's very difficult to assess the costs.
- But these costs can be very considerable in both their economic and social aspects.
- Let's look at the economic costs first.
- For example, if a company is producing fruit juice
- and it dilutes its product so that it's just a little below the concentration it should be,
- many millions of people may be paying a small amount extra for their carton of orange juice.
- Now small amounts like this may seem insignificant for individual customers -
- too small to worry about -
- but for the company, this deception might result in massive illegal profit.
- However, all studies of corporate crime agree
- that the individuals are in fact deprived of far more money by such crime
- than they are by conventional crime like robbery and theft.
- In addition to this, we have to consider the social costs of corporate crime
- and these are again very difficult to assess, but they are considerable.
- They're important because they can undermine the faith of the public in the business world
- and also, more importantly,
- because the main group of people they affect are, in fact, not the richer sections of society but the poorer.
- So here companies are robbing the poor to benefit the rich.
- There are two more points to do with corporate crime
- that I'd like to illustrate with reference to a specific event
- which occurred several years ago.
- This was an explosion of a large oil tanker
- which caused the loss of more than fifty lives of the crew.
- It was an explosion which never should have happened
- and a subsequent inquiry laid the blame not on anyone who had actually been on the tanker at the time,
- but on the owners of the tanker.
- They had deliberately decided not to carry out necessary repair work on the tanker as it was due to be sold,
- and it was this lack of repair work which was directly responsible for the explosion.
- Now this illustrates two points to do with corporate crime.
- First of all, that it does not have to be intentional.
- The owners of the tanker certainly did not intend it to explode.
- But very serious consequences can result from people or organisations
- not considering the possible results of their actions seriously enough.
- The main crime here was indifference to the human results
- rather than actual intention to harm anyone,
- but that didn't make the results any less tragic.
- And this leads me to my second point
- that corporate crime can have very severe consequences.
- It's not just a matter of companies making bigger profits than they should do,
- but of events which may affect the lives of innocent people,
- and yet very often, companies, because they say they didn't intend to harm anyone,
- can avoid taking responsibility for the results of their actions.
- And that has been a very dangerous loophole in the law.
- A further example of corporate crime was...